Dedoose has been field-tested and journal-proven by leading academic institutions and market researchers worldwide. Thousands of prominent researchers across the US and abroad have benefited from early versions of Dedoose in their qualitative and mixed methods work and have laid an outstanding publication and report trail along the way.
Bryman, Alan (2006)
Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113
Teddlie, Charles, & Yu, Fen (2007)
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1): 77-100
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene (2004)
H. R. Bernard (Ed.), Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, pp. 549-593. In S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research: A Reader on Theory and Practice, pp. 535-545.
Creswell, John W. (1994)
J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, pp. 1-19.
Caulkins, Douglas & Hyatt, Susan B. (1999)
Field Methods, 11(1): 55-26
Sieber, Sam (1973)
American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1335-1359
Morgan, David L. (2004)
S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research: A Reader on Theory and Practice, pp. 263-285. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
House, Alvin E., House, Betty J., & Campbell, Martha B. (1981)
Calculation formulas and distribution effects Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 3(1): 37-57
Weisner, Thomas S. (1996)
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, In Jessor, R., Colby, A., and Shweder, R., (Eds.). Ethnography and human development. Context and meaning in social inquiry, pp. 305-324
Alex R. Lin; Cecilia Menjívar; Andrea Vest Etteka; Sandra D. Simpkins; Erin R. Gaskin; and Annelise Pesch (2015)